Nominations for Staff Election!

tyler569 · (This post was last modified: 08-08-2014, 04:23 PM by tyler569.)

It's that time of year again everyone, time to see who the ORE community wants at the helm.

Nominate people you think would be good staffs for the job, in a few days admins will collect the nominations, approve the candidates, and open polls for election!

Your post should consist of a name to nominate and a short explanation of why they should be an admin, you may not nominate yourself.

[EDIT] Deleted irrelevant posts, please don't nominate active or inactive administrators or veterens

Legofreak · 08-08-2014, 04:21 PM

AftExplosion

He seems very knowledgeable and probably mature enough. As far as I can tell, he is very active on the server.

Plus last night he made Hex CLE(the first of its kind I think).

***LordDecapo*** · 08-08-2014, 04:35 PM

DylanRusell

Very knowledgeable on MANY MANY things when it comes to Redstone and computer science. As well has be has great people skills when teaching students and other members.
Also he seems to be one with the most (may not be but from what i have seen) knowledge on serial transmission.
And i have been in many many skype calls with him and his judgment on trials and situations seems to be very fair.

lawls dylan Big Grin

good luck!

Konstacon · (This post was last modified: 08-08-2014, 04:51 PM by Konstacon.)

i nominate JWNJWN

he thinks im tight

(for other reasons too but mostly that)

Brittany · 08-08-2014, 04:52 PM

I agree. Dylan for presuhdent.

Xray_Doc · 08-08-2014, 05:00 PM

I don't have anyone I can really look at to nominate since I'm not on the server anymore. However, I would recommend looking for someone who isn't just active on the build server, but also the school and forums.

Zark578 · 08-08-2014, 06:01 PM

AftExplosion,
He seems mature and knows a lot about redstone. He is also active on build AND school.

TITLV · 08-08-2014, 06:02 PM

nuuppanaai because he is on alot and willing to help people

Nuuppanaani · 08-08-2014, 06:03 PM

(08-08-2014, 06:02 PM)TITLV Wrote: nuuppanaai because he is on alot and willing to help people

:o that is me! thank you sir <3

EDevil · 08-08-2014, 07:47 PM

Just saying people, you do not need to nominate people who are already mentioned in previous posts.

jxu · 08-08-2014, 09:29 PM

I nominate Xray_Doc as a kind, mature, active contributor to our server. <3

PNWMan · 08-08-2014, 09:29 PM

I would like to nominate nickster. He is willing to help and would make a good staff member.

Neogreenyew · 08-08-2014, 09:56 PM

I nominate Nuup as well for Admin.

Nuup is always on and he's pretty chill.. I think he'd be a good admin.

Xray_Doc · 08-08-2014, 10:28 PM

(08-08-2014, 09:29 PM)͝ ͟ ͜ Wrote: I nominate Xray_Doc as a kind, mature, active contributor to our server. <3

To be fair, I'm actually probably one of the most mature and kindest people you would meet in real life. As for why I'm the exact opposite online, even I don't have the answer.

dylanrusell · 08-08-2014, 11:39 PM

I nominate LordDecapo

LordDecapo is extremely knowledgeable when computer science and hardware design. He is very kind and is always willing to help a person who needs it. Hopefully he does well in this election.

***qwerasd205*** · 08-09-2014, 12:05 AM

I nominate LordDecapo (also :p)

PhysoniumI · (This post was last modified: 08-09-2014, 01:16 PM by PhysoniumI.)

Recently there's been a lot of bitching about admins being useless. A key part about being an admin/staff is being willing to put aside your work and HELP OTHER PEOPLE above all else, or you'd just become like all of the other puported "badmins". Being a good builder does not mean they'd be a good admin and should not be part of the consideration WHAT SO EVER which has been what everyone has been focusing this around.

It should be a popularity contest (kinda) with some moderation. Staff need to be trustworthy and be on quite a bit. A lot of the nominated people haven't been on a ton (in my terms, which are rather insane) from what I've seen. If you're staff and only are on for an hour every other day, you might as well not as you don't contribute.

TL;DR
NEW BADMINS, DON'T BE AS BAD AS THE OTHERS :3

(that make sense kinda?)

(08-09-2014, 04:22 AM)Guy1234567890 Wrote: If you are nominated and you don't have the time to put in to be staff, please don't accept your nomination. If everybody who is nominated self assesses their ability to serve the community honestly, then we should end up with a good list of candidates.

Thanks Guy. Don't get salty :3

AFtExploision · 08-09-2014, 12:23 AM

I nominate cutlass

PhysoniumI · (This post was last modified: 08-09-2014, 01:24 PM by PhysoniumI.)

paulydboy fuckit

gotta change my nomination a lot, shake it up, amirite?

Apuly · 08-09-2014, 12:28 AM

I nominate SebSeif for admin!
#SebSeif or rito!

jxu · 08-09-2014, 01:40 AM

(08-09-2014, 12:19 AM)PhysoniumI Wrote: Recently there's been a lot of bitching about admins being useless. A key part about being an admin/staff is being willing to put aside your work and HELP OTHER PEOPLE above all else, or you'd just become like all of the other puported "badmins". Being a good builder does not mean they'd be a good admin and should not be part of the consideration WHAT SO EVER which has been what everyone has been focusing this around.

It should be a popularity contest (kinda) with some moderation. Staff need to be trustworthy and be on quite a bit. A lot of the nominated people haven't been on a ton (in my terms, which are rather insane) from what I've seen. If you're staff and only are on for an hour every other day, you might as well not as you don't contribute.

(that make sense kinda?)

TL;DR everyone who has been nominated so far is under-qualified

Xray_Doc · 08-09-2014, 02:33 AM

Ow the edgyness

Guy1234567890 · 08-09-2014, 04:22 AM

If you are nominated and you don't have the time to put in to be staff, please don't accept your nomination. If everybody who is nominated self assesses their ability to serve the community honestly, then we should end up with a good list of candidates.

Xray_Doc · 08-09-2014, 05:21 AM

I turn down my nomination, I don't feel qualified and I think the nomination was a joke.

PabloDons · (This post was last modified: 08-09-2014, 03:03 PM by PabloDons.)

I will proudly nominate ͝ ͟ ͜

he is a very active member of the forums and I think he will make great staff considering forum activity. I believe he would be extremely helpful and a huge contribution towards staff activity.

Neogreenyew · 08-09-2014, 02:36 PM

I change my nomination from Nuup tp LordDecapo
Sorry nuup <3

greatgamer34 · 08-09-2014, 11:44 PM

I would like to nominate Shadekiller666

When he is active, he makes a huge contribution to the ORE community working on various projects and is never afraid to help out!

jxu · (This post was last modified: 08-10-2014, 03:29 AM by jxu.)

(08-09-2014, 02:27 PM)PabloDons Wrote: I will proudly nominate ͝ ͟ ͜

he is a very active member of the forums and I think he will make great staff considering forum activity. I believe he would be extremely helpful and a huge contribution towards staff activity.

Thank you
I do my best
in fact I am more active than everyone nominated in terms of forum activity

tyler569 · 08-10-2014, 01:20 PM

(08-09-2014, 02:27 PM)PabloDons Wrote: I will proudly nominate ͝ ͟ ͜

We'll need to know who he is first.

PabloDons · 08-10-2014, 05:15 PM

(08-10-2014, 01:20 PM)tyler569 Wrote:
(08-09-2014, 02:27 PM)PabloDons Wrote: I will proudly nominate ͝ ͟ ͜

We'll need to know who he is first.

I'd like to nominate him as forum staff, no need to know who he is

tyler569 · (This post was last modified: 08-10-2014, 05:22 PM by tyler569.)

(08-10-2014, 05:15 PM)PabloDons Wrote:
(08-10-2014, 01:20 PM)tyler569 Wrote:
(08-09-2014, 02:27 PM)PabloDons Wrote: I will proudly nominate ͝ ͟ ͜

We'll need to know who he is first.
I'd like to nominate him as forum staff, no need to know who he is

Founding priciples of ORE, forged out of RDF mistakes, include something to the effect of, "Staff is Staff, no school staff or web staff or ssh enabled vs not ssh enabled staff, just Staff."

gtaguy235 · 08-10-2014, 11:38 PM

I nominate Nuuppananaani (idk if that's right) because he is very active and will be mature but can have a laugh. Big Grin

Jupperware · 08-11-2014, 04:03 AM

PNWMan or PhysoniumI

PNWMan is very eager to improve the condition of Lessons, and would be better able to do that as an admin. He is always very willing to help.

PhysoniumI doesn't put up with stupid people (a pro and/or a con for an admin, depending) and he is pretty much always online, which is ideal for staff.

Crazyninja2000 · 08-11-2014, 12:57 PM

(08-10-2014, 05:22 PM)tyler569 Wrote:
(08-10-2014, 05:15 PM)PabloDons Wrote:
(08-10-2014, 01:20 PM)tyler569 Wrote:
(08-09-2014, 02:27 PM)PabloDons Wrote: I will proudly nominate ͝ ͟ ͜

We'll need to know who he is first.
I'd like to nominate him as forum staff, no need to know who he is

Founding priciples of ORE, forged out of RDF mistakes, include something to the effect of, "Staff is Staff, no school staff or web staff or ssh enabled vs not ssh enabled staff, just Staff."

͝ ͟ ͜ is nuup

PabloDons · 08-11-2014, 01:50 PM

(08-11-2014, 12:57 PM)Crazyninja2000 Wrote: ͝ ͟ ͜ is nuup

I doubt it

tyler569 · 08-11-2014, 01:51 PM

(08-11-2014, 01:50 PM)PabloDons Wrote:
(08-11-2014, 12:57 PM)Crazyninja2000 Wrote: ͝ ͟ ͜ is nuup
I doubt it

I can assure you from IP logs it is not. I know who the person is, I mean only that they have to publicly reveal their identity.

tyler569 · (This post was last modified: 08-11-2014, 08:11 PM by tyler569.)

Fair warning to everyone, nominations wrap up within the next 12 hours.

tha_cre8er · (This post was last modified: 08-12-2014, 02:44 AM by tha_cre8er.)

i nominate...Nuuppananaani

tyler569 · 08-12-2014, 03:10 AM

And with that troll post nominations for the Staff election of August 2014 are now closed.

Best of luck to all those nominated and next time to all who were not.

If you were nominated, be sure to go accept your nomination in my other thread!

The ORE MyBB forums are being retired. Please use the new discussion board. View more information regarding the migration.