07-12-2014, 06:39 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-12-2014, 06:42 PM by scrounchtike.)
I agree with the most part with PNW, although i think merging school with build is a bad idea, this is for another topic.
I really feel like the current system of applications is quite unorganized. Like PNWMan said, shy people probably won't ask admins for application review. These people will probably leave the server and this is an issue, we are losing people because of our current application system. Now, with the moderator rank, i think it could be an idea to make application reviews more structured. For example, at 10 PM (idk which time) multiple moderators, in fact all the one connected, could go check apps on the forums. I personally think that just this could really help the structure of ORE.
Now, for what Cut said about getting Membership. I really think that having a world for "maturity test" is a great idea, but I don't think that members should decide about other testificates. Here are the reasons:
1. I don't think all the members are interested into ORE politics or into these type of mechanics. Most of us are here to redstone. So I think that only Mods or Staff should get the right to decide over a testificate.
2. If there is a lot of Members, ideas might be misunderstood. For example, maybe a testificate would be denied with Members and be accepted with a Staff. This doesn't really make sense. Plus, there might be confusion between the members: Someone saw him spam, but no one is sure if that is true.... All sort of things may happen that makes Members unreliable.
So, if like I said Mods and Staff are the only ones deciding over testificates, Cut's idea is a great way to improve ORE.
I really feel like the current system of applications is quite unorganized. Like PNWMan said, shy people probably won't ask admins for application review. These people will probably leave the server and this is an issue, we are losing people because of our current application system. Now, with the moderator rank, i think it could be an idea to make application reviews more structured. For example, at 10 PM (idk which time) multiple moderators, in fact all the one connected, could go check apps on the forums. I personally think that just this could really help the structure of ORE.
Now, for what Cut said about getting Membership. I really think that having a world for "maturity test" is a great idea, but I don't think that members should decide about other testificates. Here are the reasons:
1. I don't think all the members are interested into ORE politics or into these type of mechanics. Most of us are here to redstone. So I think that only Mods or Staff should get the right to decide over a testificate.
2. If there is a lot of Members, ideas might be misunderstood. For example, maybe a testificate would be denied with Members and be accepted with a Staff. This doesn't really make sense. Plus, there might be confusion between the members: Someone saw him spam, but no one is sure if that is true.... All sort of things may happen that makes Members unreliable.
So, if like I said Mods and Staff are the only ones deciding over testificates, Cut's idea is a great way to improve ORE.