04-16-2015, 10:00 PM
(04-16-2015, 09:51 PM)GISED_Link Wrote:(04-14-2015, 09:28 PM)Nuuppanaani Wrote: The new POL is not yet set up but it will be in a day or two. However, we're unaware on the layout we're going for.
I propose this:
4 different sections
Then those are divided into smaller sub-categories, like different gates, adders, memory etc.
- Stuff with pistons
- Pistonless horizontal
- Pistonless diagonal
- Pistonless vertical
Nick proposed we should do the same, but with 2 sections:
~ more ~
- Piston stuff
- Pistonless stuff
I think you are making it wrong. You are dividing the plot according to the Physical technology. And as it was said before, there is more than 2 physical technologies (Hex for example (!) ). See there for more details : http://forum.openredstone.org/showthread.php?tid=6056
According to my post about wiki organization (see http://forum.openredstone.org/showthread...2#pid37342), I think we should divide the four plots by categories. I mean one plot for the components (even there are a lot of kind, they are small, so..), two for the devices, and I let the fourth for other things (water logic, piston only and some other "exotic" things ?)
I think we can seperate the diffrent physical technlogies into the plot by letting a bit of space between the components/devices.
So, my idea is :
So, what do you think about that ?
- Components (with all the using/useful physical technologies)
- Devices 1
- Devices 2
- Exotic diveces (all the un-using/ unuseful physical technogies) (because it's alway fun ^^)
Can I have examples of what exactly is a component and what is a device?