10-07-2014, 11:52 PM
(10-06-2014, 05:40 AM)TSO Wrote: We aren't in the same page as far as the proof thing, but I think I'm just going to give up on that.
I'm very good with electrical engineering, but that is completely useless in minecraft. (Not really a way to prove it since anything you ask me could just as easily be googled, so if you believe me or not is up to you)
CS I just kinda wing it. I know what it needs to do, trial and error suffice to get me the rest of the way pretty quickly.
My ideas are so vastly different because I often model compuers in thought expiriments. Though, this has led to some odd results. (For example, it is theoretically possible for a computer to run without a clock, which is actually the basis for some of my ocilloscope.)
It wasn't about being on the same page... it's merely a fact that without supporting evidence doesn't mean it's true if there's no unsporting evidence (this is how science works)
EE knowledge can be applied very well in MC, just not the fundamentals.
Trial and error is good and is a important step in learning EE or CS, or even redstone magic, just be sure to take note of what happens and try to expand your knowledge based on that
Look on my plot and you'll see nothing interesting, my brain is my library of knowledge, not my plot i probably can't compare to Decapo but i do definitely simulate just about everything in my head, so we are much alike if that's how you truly are (Yay for dyslexia power )
Also it's impossible to have a effective clockles (meaning that it's allways effectively clocked, not that "clockles" is bad or uneffective), as in clockles designed you have a something holding data back until stage is completed computation, this in it's self generates a clock, or other means of clockles implementations has similar effects
If it's ok to, may i see your current progress, you have a good few ideas and would just like to see a little more about them (I've had most of them my self which intrigues me to see how someone else would go about those ideas.)