10-29-2014, 10:34 PM
(This post was last modified: 10-29-2014, 10:38 PM by AltruismAndCake.)
pablo - NP keep on chugging that train 
. A few questions though.
1) first of all I don't want rules to be implemented because staff is surely capable of making decisions themselves. That's what I tried to point out.
I agree for most of the staff, but what about GG? (sorry about bringing it up GG) I think what he's looking for is a guideline he can follow so he knows how he should behave in cases where people agitate him personally. We tell him to follow the guidelines and when he ask how, do we just ignore the question?
2) About trying to crash the server, the guidelines are more than enough to deal with that. if you try to crash the server, you're being a dick and breaking multiple guidelines.
How about it breaks only one of the guidelines? Generally be kind to others. I'm getting that from http://openredstone.org/rules/ If it's breaking multiple guidelines, then are there unwritten ones we don't know about? That's my main concern... assuming something's universal and it's not.
3) If you're going to implement guidelines for banning,
There is one already, it's for plagiarism. But that's probably just me being nit-picky xD
On the rest, I'm not saying hard and fast "These are the rules. Deal". I'm saying maybe the guidelines are missing something. Maybe we should be talking about what the guidelines should be, instead of what the rules should be?
Decapo - So you issue a minimum of one warning? Isn't that in itself a basis for proper staff conduct in the worst case scenario?
Edit: I find it ironic that tyler signed that he was against the rules idea when he corrected nuup on an unwritten rule
. A few questions though.1) first of all I don't want rules to be implemented because staff is surely capable of making decisions themselves. That's what I tried to point out.
I agree for most of the staff, but what about GG? (sorry about bringing it up GG) I think what he's looking for is a guideline he can follow so he knows how he should behave in cases where people agitate him personally. We tell him to follow the guidelines and when he ask how, do we just ignore the question?
2) About trying to crash the server, the guidelines are more than enough to deal with that. if you try to crash the server, you're being a dick and breaking multiple guidelines.
How about it breaks only one of the guidelines? Generally be kind to others. I'm getting that from http://openredstone.org/rules/ If it's breaking multiple guidelines, then are there unwritten ones we don't know about? That's my main concern... assuming something's universal and it's not.
3) If you're going to implement guidelines for banning,
There is one already, it's for plagiarism. But that's probably just me being nit-picky xD
On the rest, I'm not saying hard and fast "These are the rules. Deal". I'm saying maybe the guidelines are missing something. Maybe we should be talking about what the guidelines should be, instead of what the rules should be?
Decapo - So you issue a minimum of one warning? Isn't that in itself a basis for proper staff conduct in the worst case scenario?
Edit: I find it ironic that tyler signed that he was against the rules idea when he corrected nuup on an unwritten rule