10-29-2014, 04:09 PM
I think I read all the posts, so I figure I'll add some input.
PabloDons - you said "if it's not broken, don't fix it", but it appears to be broken to me. If someone spams, is that against the rules? If someone tries to crash the server, is it against the rules? Is it against the guidelines? Rules aren't written down as a zero-tolerance policy, but as a "You can't say I didn't know" policy. Also it can be a guideline for banning people, not for admins that are lenient but strict people for "This is the soonest I can kick/ban people who are breaking the rules".
I agree TSO, people usually vote or post before reading everything. Should I make a post asking a random question with a poll, and then make the post completely unrelated to it, just for fun's sake in off-topic? PM me a response, I have an idea in mind >
LordDecapo/The Magical Gentleman - I agree strictness should be based to the case, but shouldn't there be a lower limit of antagonizing before a person gets banned?
BTW I read the document, and while I'll don't want any admins to get punished, is there any way an admin can be punished/corrected? I've got the impression from someone that admins can't be replaced, because there is a lack of people with time and trust both. Is this true?
PabloDons - you said "if it's not broken, don't fix it", but it appears to be broken to me. If someone spams, is that against the rules? If someone tries to crash the server, is it against the rules? Is it against the guidelines? Rules aren't written down as a zero-tolerance policy, but as a "You can't say I didn't know" policy. Also it can be a guideline for banning people, not for admins that are lenient but strict people for "This is the soonest I can kick/ban people who are breaking the rules".
I agree TSO, people usually vote or post before reading everything. Should I make a post asking a random question with a poll, and then make the post completely unrelated to it, just for fun's sake in off-topic? PM me a response, I have an idea in mind >
LordDecapo/The Magical Gentleman - I agree strictness should be based to the case, but shouldn't there be a lower limit of antagonizing before a person gets banned?
BTW I read the document, and while I'll don't want any admins to get punished, is there any way an admin can be punished/corrected? I've got the impression from someone that admins can't be replaced, because there is a lack of people with time and trust both. Is this true?