Ideas for server rules

[Nickster258]

You clearly haven't read what the document currently states. It describes the evolution of your ban, how you should conduct yourself (which has not changed from the original terms of service, except that I added a line about lying to students), how the admins should conduct themselves to help minimize situations such as the current one, and minimum required staff for certain types of ban. As a whole, users will not notice anything different about their experience, except that the administrative decisions are encouraged to be as public as possible, and you aren't allowed to deliberately lie to students about redstone stuff.

Staff are advised to conduct themselves with dignity and set an example for the users, but the restrictions on user's speech have been removed. A ban will only occur if the staff determine what you say has malicious intent.

What I am saying is that there is currently no need to have a 'standard' to these bans. Common sense dictates what would be appropriate in that given situation. Also, the previous staff members all stated that there was no previous discussion of this topic in Rhodium Box. That, combined with the fact that the original wording never suggested this to be a topic for the community to discuss but instead a new set of rules for the community to follow, makes me believe that the community backlash has lead this to a 'discussion' thread.

Even the outcomes of the poll are 80% 'no' (as of writing this). That should be evidence enough that what was posted will not benefit the community at the moment.