10-28-2014, 05:23 PM
Not that I have any special input on policy anymore, but I simply must respond to this:
Whoa, dude, calm down a moment.
1.
Just taking control are we? No more productive admin debate?
2.
Is way harsher than ORE/the RDF has ever been. I think I'm generally regarded as 'no-nonsense' and I would give more than 4 warnings. I usually used to give 2 or 3 before I would even kick someone.
3.
There is a disturbingly long thread over in incidents (reference) about how quick you are to snap at someone / kick them / ban them, and I notice you've started banning people on my forum as well, do you *really* think implementing a strict ruleset is what this community needs right now? If you ask me, (should you desire my advice) you need to lay the fuck off for a while, because all you'll end up doing is pissing people off and scaring away potential members.
~Tyler
Whoa, dude, calm down a moment.
1.
greatgamer34 Wrote:I'm implementing a 4 step warning system.
Just taking control are we? No more productive admin debate?
2.
greatgamer34 Wrote:a)Warning 1, is verbal(please stop doing that)
b)Warning 2, is a kick
c)warning 3, is a tempban
d)warning 4, is a permban
Is way harsher than ORE/the RDF has ever been. I think I'm generally regarded as 'no-nonsense' and I would give more than 4 warnings. I usually used to give 2 or 3 before I would even kick someone.
3.
There is a disturbingly long thread over in incidents (reference) about how quick you are to snap at someone / kick them / ban them, and I notice you've started banning people on my forum as well, do you *really* think implementing a strict ruleset is what this community needs right now? If you ask me, (should you desire my advice) you need to lay the fuck off for a while, because all you'll end up doing is pissing people off and scaring away potential members.
~Tyler