04-22-2013, 04:01 PM
AMD: Cheaper, easier to Overclock, come with better integrated graphics.
Intel: More powerful, Hyperthreading.
Intel: More powerful, Hyperthreading.
04-22-2013, 04:01 PM
AMD: Cheaper, easier to Overclock, come with better integrated graphics.
Intel: More powerful, Hyperthreading.
04-22-2013, 08:50 PM
(This post was last modified: 04-22-2013, 08:50 PM by bannanalord.)
Motorola.
microcontrollers. electricity. fire. wood. tree. leaves. carbon. ...science And that kids, is how you off-topic. Mediastuffs
-youtubes-
04-23-2013, 12:46 PM
For me its AMD because raw power.
Im getting two 8 core bulldozers @ 4.2Ghz for rendering. and all for under half the price a single Intel CPU would cost with the same amount of power.
04-23-2013, 05:21 PM
idk, i've build a lot of pc's for friends, family & other people. If they come to my and say "i want a fast gaming pc for €500", i choose a AMD, so i can get a more powerful GPU, while still keeping CPU power. = cost FTW
Why do i keep coming back? No idea.
04-24-2013, 02:55 AM
But... PowerPC vs AMD
AMD XD
05-14-2013, 11:34 AM
The synopsis is basically this: Price determines build. I would not have gotten a six-core 2.7Ghz if I went with Intel for $90. But, speaking that AMD's most expensive CPU for consumers is the FX-8350 and is only $200~ and you want to spend more, go Intel.
01-08-2014, 04:26 PM
INTEL ALL DA WAY, no logic involved
#OREproblems *extreme bumps by aft and Jmk*
01-08-2014, 04:52 PM
AMD Vs Nvidia!
01-08-2014, 05:10 PM
|
|