+- Forums - Open Redstone Engineers (https://forum.openredstone.org)
+-- Forum: Off-Topic (https://forum.openredstone.org/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: Off-Topic Discussion (https://forum.openredstone.org/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: AMD VS Intel (/thread-28.html)
AMD VS Intel - Nickster258 - 04-16-2013
Which is better? Be logical!!!
RE: AMD VS Intel - Cutlassw30 - 04-17-2013
None. They are both great for what they are. No AMD is NOT better just for price and when AMD comes out with games that come with there CPUs intel will be in deep dodo. Intel CPUs are actually have less power than AMD but have a better per clock ratio and use a lot of new tech.
RE: AMD VS Intel - Nickster258 - 04-17-2013
My logic exactly, cutlass.
RE: AMD VS Intel - JeremyG - 04-17-2013
I'd agree with that there is none better than the other. It's just a matter of what you want to do with them.
RE: AMD VS Intel - Nickster258 - 04-17-2013
Same. Intel in some areas and AMD in others.
RE: AMD VS Intel - Xeomorpher - 04-18-2013
It depends on purpose, budget and to the greatest degree, subjection.
RE: AMD VS Intel - JeremyG - 04-18-2013
So basically, /thread.
RE: AMD VS Intel - Nickster258 - 04-18-2013
I have noticed something. Depending on the price and the use is the best way to determine what CPU to get.
RE: AMD VS Intel - EDevil - 04-18-2013
(04-18-2013, 09:27 PM)Nickster258 Wrote: I have noticed something. Depending on the price and the use is the best way to determine what CPU to get.
For sure, especially the use for a system is important. If i would want to have a awesome gaming rig, then i could buy a cheaper (amd) processor and spend more on le gpu.
RE: AMD VS Intel - Nickster258 - 04-19-2013
Yep, I noticed for cheap builds, AMD is really spot-on most of the time. But if one is to spend around $1400+ on a build, they are likely to get an i5 or an i7.
RE: AMD VS Intel - seankingman - 04-22-2013
AMD: Cheaper, easier to Overclock, come with better integrated graphics.
Intel: More powerful, Hyperthreading.
RE: AMD VS Intel - bannanalord - 04-22-2013
Motorola.
microcontrollers.
electricity.
fire.
wood.
tree.
leaves.
carbon.
...science
And that kids, is how you off-topic.
RE: AMD VS Intel - shrogg - 04-23-2013
For me its AMD because raw power.
Im getting two 8 core bulldozers @ 4.2Ghz for rendering. and all for under half the price a single Intel CPU would cost with the same amount of power.
RE: AMD VS Intel - EDevil - 04-23-2013
idk, i've build a lot of pc's for friends, family & other people. If they come to my and say "i want a fast gaming pc for €500", i choose a AMD, so i can get a more powerful GPU, while still keeping CPU power. = cost FTW
RE: AMD VS Intel - Malcolmforde - 04-24-2013
But... PowerPC vs AMD
AMD XD
RE: AMD VS Intel - Nickster258 - 05-14-2013
The synopsis is basically this: Price determines build. I would not have gotten a six-core 2.7Ghz if I went with Intel for $90. But, speaking that AMD's most expensive CPU for consumers is the FX-8350 and is only $200~ and you want to spend more, go Intel.
RE: AMD VS Intel - Jmking80 - 01-08-2014
INTEL ALL DA WAY, no logic involved
#OREproblems *extreme bumps by aft and Jmk*
RE: AMD VS Intel - Halflife390 - 01-08-2014
AMD Vs Nvidia!
RE: AMD VS Intel - Xeomorpher - 01-08-2014
AMD vs ORE
RE: AMD VS Intel - seankingman - 01-08-2014
(01-08-2014, 04:52 PM)Halflife390 Wrote: AMD Vs Nvidia!
Nvidia 100%
Unless you have an AMD processor. (Which I do but I still have a 770)
RE: AMD VS Intel - Xeomorpher - 01-08-2014
Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat, nvidia are awful with drivers
RE: AMD VS Intel - Nickster258 - 01-08-2014
(01-08-2014, 05:10 PM)seankingman Wrote:(01-08-2014, 04:52 PM)Halflife390 Wrote: AMD Vs Nvidia!
Nvidia 100%
Unless you have an AMD processor. (Which I do but I still have a 770)
False. Many times Radeon graphics will far out-do the NVidia graphics, especially in the price. In recent tests, the top AMD card can out perform the Titan, and for nearly half the price.
Suck it NVidia fanboys :3
Oh, and they both have benefits. I will recommend one over the other depending on certain conditions: Price, compatibility, and need.
RE: AMD VS Intel - seankingman - 01-08-2014
(01-08-2014, 05:28 PM)Nickster258 Wrote:(01-08-2014, 05:10 PM)seankingman Wrote:(01-08-2014, 04:52 PM)Halflife390 Wrote: AMD Vs Nvidia!
Nvidia 100%
Unless you have an AMD processor. (Which I do but I still have a 770)
False. Many times Radeon graphics will far out-do the NVidia graphics, especially in the price. In recent tests, the top AMD card can out perform the Titan, and for nearly half the price.
Suck it NVidia fanboys :3
Oh, and they both have benefits. I will recommend one over the other depending on certain conditions: Price, compatibility, and need.
True enough Nick.
I have just had a better experience with Nvidia and due to the fact I use FSX, Nvidia wins outright for me.
One reason I would go for AMD however is that their high end cards offer 3GB VRAM as standard compared to Nvidia's outdated 2GB.
RE: AMD VS Intel - Xray_Doc - 01-08-2014
Stop bumping this shit. There is a clear distiction between the Off-Topic and Shenanigans section.
RE: AMD VS Intel - Chibill - 01-09-2014
Intel here because servers don't need CPUs built by people who make GPUs. And I can upgrade from my pentium to and i7 when I have the money.
RE: AMD VS Intel - EDevil - 01-09-2014
Dude, nvidia drivers fucking suck xD (And yesh, im running a 670, so dont say im a amd fanboy or anything)
1. When running my 3 screens at 5760x1200 / 6000x1200 (bezel corrected resolution), i can choose in the Nvidia control panel wether i want to maximize windows across all of the screens, or just on a single one. I like the 2nd option, cause then i can edit, record MC, and see YT videos all at the same time. Luckily for me, it doesnt even matter at which option you put it in, windows will fully maximize anyways (Menaing that the function is clearly broken)! Hoeraay!
2. Me being a smart ass; well, then i just dont game anymore on 6000x1200, and just on 1920x1200 (single monitor)? Well suprise suprise, in order to change my Surround settings, i need to close the following programs;
- Steam
- Logitech configuration panel
- Minecraft
- Sony Veags
- Audacity
- Origin
Its a shame that Nvidia puts out these drivers, next time i'll upgrade my rig its going to be AMD.
RE: AMD VS Intel - seankingman - 01-09-2014
Yea, I've had problems with the drivers as well (as I now install the latest one, ironically
) but as I have stated before, FSX doesn't like AMD and that's really one of the only other things I play so there's is no point in me going for AMD. I have also had problems with my A10's onboard 7660D not performing well before I got my 770.
RE: AMD VS Intel - EDevil - 01-09-2014
Intel onboard graphics it is then...
RE: AMD VS Intel - seankingman - 01-09-2014
I'd never use onboard graphics though, It was just that my 480 broke so I had to make do with it until I got my 770.
RE: AMD VS Intel - EDevil - 01-09-2014
(01-09-2014, 08:12 PM)seankingman Wrote: I'd never use onboard graphics though, It was just that my 480 broke so I had to make do with it until I got my 770.
It was a joke
RE: AMD VS Intel - seankingman - 01-09-2014
1,000?!
RE: AMD VS Intel - WrytXander - 01-09-2014
Motorola FTW!
RE: AMD VS Intel - EDevil - 01-10-2014
fck Motorola as well
Had a Minestone 2. That thing had a locked boot loader, keyboard was broken, and was a common bug within the community. Once android 4.* was released, the phopne was still only at 2.3, and i had to custom rom it to 3.4.2 (which i figured out after i broke the thing twice by flashing. That was my own fault. )
RE: AMD VS Intel - seankingman - 01-10-2014
What card manufactures do you recommend (eg. MSI, EVGA, etc.)?
I have a MSI Gaming card.
RE: AMD VS Intel - EDevil - 01-10-2014
I would go for msi as well. Generally a good choice, but so is Asus or Gigabyte (I had some problems with it, but that's just my opp. Overall, Gigabyte has some very good cards).
RE: AMD VS Intel - seankingman - 01-10-2014
Yea, they always seem to be much cheaper than the rest but still as good quality wise. My Gaming 770 is also very aesthetically pleasing due to the Twin Frozr Cooler:
http://cdn.overclock.net/1/1d/1d5f5fdd_07-big-geforce-gtx770-msi-twin-frozr-oc.jpeg
RE: AMD VS Intel - EDevil - 01-10-2014
Put it together with this one;
![[Image: five_pictures3_2839_20130513130647_g.png]](http://www.msi.com/pic/product/five_pictures3_2839_20130513130647_g.png)
and you have this:
![[Image: Z87_GAMING_11.jpg]](http://nl.msi.com/pic/image/mb/z87gaming/Z87_GAMING_11.jpg)
#Nerdgasm
Btw, so jealous at your gpu man, im still at the 670
RE: AMD VS Intel - seankingman - 01-10-2014
Haha
, they really do look good!I was originally going for a 670 but the 770 was only about £40 more expensive and seen as I was getting it for Xmas I might as well go for it
The 770 is basically a 680 on steroids!
RE: AMD VS Intel - Xray_Doc - 01-10-2014
I dont care if that thing works or not, I would put it into a trophy case for good it looks.
RE: AMD VS Intel - Chibill - 01-10-2014
I have a MSI mother board with and in tell Pentium 2 as my server with 8 GB of ram no GPU but the onboard one that has HDMI and VGA and don't get a Corsair CX430 PSU it won't work with it so I swiped it for a EVGA 100-W1-0430-KR 430W and this runs me and himehowareu's server