07-08-2016, 03:44 AM
"Will this lower the "standards"? It is quite likely." "The hopes with this is that the standards are not lowered." -Well, how's that going to work?
""just enough". It makes assessing Testificates hellish and it is just not a good standard to go by." -I don't think that just an understanding of logic gates and some basic logic concepts is a good standard to go by, either!
" This is just making the terms for entry more vague so as to force students to "get creative" if you will." -Ok, I can see how being vague helps a little in this situation, so students don't have a preset idea of "other basic computational concepts such as logical circuits and the like," as it would make students come up with mostly their own ideas for the trial.
What will happen to school, will it be kept? What about more staff? How else will trials be reformed? And how will the trial system be made fair so it is not almost entirely subject to an invidual staff member's opinion? None of these were answered!
""just enough". It makes assessing Testificates hellish and it is just not a good standard to go by." -I don't think that just an understanding of logic gates and some basic logic concepts is a good standard to go by, either!
" This is just making the terms for entry more vague so as to force students to "get creative" if you will." -Ok, I can see how being vague helps a little in this situation, so students don't have a preset idea of "other basic computational concepts such as logical circuits and the like," as it would make students come up with mostly their own ideas for the trial.
What will happen to school, will it be kept? What about more staff? How else will trials be reformed? And how will the trial system be made fair so it is not almost entirely subject to an invidual staff member's opinion? None of these were answered!