+- Forums - Open Redstone Engineers (https://forum.openredstone.org)
+-- Forum: ORE General (https://forum.openredstone.org/forum-39.html)
+--- Forum: Projects & Inventions (https://forum.openredstone.org/forum-19.html)
+---- Forum: In Progress (https://forum.openredstone.org/forum-20.html)
+---- Thread: intOREnet (/thread-5661.html)
RE: intOREnet - slugdude - 07-31-2015
(07-31-2015, 01:16 PM)LordDecapo Wrote: Does this store the entire address of people? Or just a part of it?
Cause I just had the thought of splitting up addresses into geographical regions. So you would only have to keep a single small memory segment saying which addresses are local, and the device then just has to read route it based on if the location referencedata is N,S,E,W of the switch.
Could speed things up a bit and shrink the switches
I did have a similar idea already but decided against it, but I can't remember why. Besides, it doesn''t look like it's going to be *that* big. Since things have already been built around the address system I described, changing it at this point would probably be extra unnecessary effort. The memory will be about half the size of the total switch. the hubs will be even smaller since all addresses except local ones should be routed to the switch it is connected to, thus there is no need for the memory and it's associated parts.
RE: intOREnet - Legofreak - 08-01-2015
Yap7 claimed the plot directly south of me... I'm kind of pissed because i was trying to get decapo to let me claim it just the other day.
Hopefully yap7 will allow lines through his plot or want to be a part of it.
RE: intOREnet - slugdude - 08-03-2015
(08-01-2015, 09:52 PM)Legofreak Wrote: Yap7 claimed the plot directly south of me... I'm kind of pissed because i was trying to get decapo to let me claim it just the other day.
Hopefully yap7 will allow lines through his plot or want to be a part of it.
I asked him to claim there so you could be connected. If you still need another plot there is one to the west of you.
RE: intOREnet - Legofreak - 08-03-2015
I didnt realize you asked him. I don't really need a new plot. Decapo denied because my plot isnt that filled up.
BTW, I'm glad to be in on the project now.
RE: intOREnet - LordDecapo - 08-03-2015
I just said, make a good argument to get a new plot (like say a new project is going to be massive and you need the space) if you need all the space for a project thats fine lol
RE: intOREnet - Legofreak - 08-03-2015
I was going to but I was procrastinating. I figured that it wouldn't get auto claimed for a while since I was so far out. Yap claiming that plot is just as good.
RE: intOREnet - IPositron - 08-05-2015
Omg dats genius
RE: intOREnet - TSO - 09-03-2015
SO... let's say I want to send something to LD from my nonexistant plot. To make it simple, I'll say that LD is a straight line to the west of me. I'll say the hub under me is hub 0, the one to my north is hub 1, the one to my west is hub 2. Okay, in order to get from me to LD, let's say it has to go through a minimum of 5 hubs. How does hub 0 know that the next hub it needs to get to is hub 2? Does it have a large table saying which of the other 62 connections are on which of the 4 output ports it has? If hub 2 is busy, and my hub decides to reroute through the north hub (hub 1), how does it know that by sending hub 1 my data, it will end up at LD's plot. When the data gets to hub 1, if hub 1 says that the best way to get to LD's plot is through hub 0, what prevents it from being routed back to hub 0?
RE: intOREnet - Back_and_Black1 - 09-04-2015
He probably will use LPM (longest prefix match algorithm) it's whats used irl.
RE: intOREnet - TSO - 09-04-2015
*uses google* I see... I think... mayb... no, I have no idea how that works.