01-10-2015, 11:58 AM
(01-10-2015, 02:59 AM)LordDecapo Wrote:(01-10-2015, 12:41 AM)Nickster258 Wrote:(01-10-2015, 12:21 AM)LordDecapo Wrote:(01-09-2015, 08:55 PM)slugdude Wrote:(01-09-2015, 04:50 PM)tyler569 Wrote: Considering people don't understand how to elect people as it is (go back and look at old votes - half of them are wrong somehow) - it does matter how complicated it is.
You can't count votes if no one knows how it works, and no one reads the voting threads as it is.
"Put your favorite 3 people" is comprehensible, simple, and representative without over-complicating it for the sole purpose (it seems) of jacking off to the numberz.
Agreed
but number jerking is good jerking.. number 4 and 7 both know exactly how i like it already
lol i see what you mean though. tellign them to split 100points between votes is going to be a pain in the ass, as only like 5 ppl will do it right
That's why I propose a simple 50/50 split of power
k ill use the 50/50 and post the voting thread tomorrow morning. we can test it out, and move from there, as Yes with out issue has the most votes anyways.
#QuoteChain
#BetterQuoteChain
So we're going to vote for out top 3 now, and the result from members will be averaged, and the results from staff will be averaged, and then those 2 are averaged?