+- Forums - Open Redstone Engineers (https://forum.openredstone.org)
+-- Forum: ORE General (https://forum.openredstone.org/forum-39.html)
+--- Forum: Build Discussion (https://forum.openredstone.org/forum-50.html)
+--- Thread: We need more active staff! (/thread-4973.html)
We need more active staff! - qwerasd205 - 10-28-2014
I believe many ORE members can attest to the low level of active staff on ORE, so I call fourth a poll, I think there should be an election for Nov, 2014. If so I'd like to run so someone please nominate me >
The Poll expires in 1 week.
RE: We need more active staff! - jxu - 10-28-2014
it's fine actually
RE: We need more active staff! - Magic :^) - 10-28-2014
Personally, I'm neutral on the matter. But then again, I have not needed the services of teh adminz since becoming a member. I've seen Decap, Nuup, and Great online quite often tho.
*shrugs*
idk
RE: We need more active staff! - GISED_Link - 10-28-2014
until greatgamer34 decline all the bad applications... we don't need more staff XD
RE: We need more active staff! - greatgamer34 - 10-28-2014
(10-28-2014, 01:16 AM)GISED_Link Wrote: until greatgamer34 decline all the bad applications... we don't need more staff XD
i like the way this guy thinks
RE: We need more active staff! - greatgamer34 - 10-28-2014
we had 6 staff members to 4 members on today, staffing is not an issue...
RE: We need more active staff! - Chibill - 10-28-2014
Yeah its an issue.
RE: We need more active staff! - PabloDons - 10-28-2014
it's not, there's constantly a staff member when I'm on (unless it's early in the morning in which I don't bother going on)
RE: We need more active staff! - Xray_Doc - 10-28-2014
Having even just 1 staff online is fine, as we all voted on the staff and we're accepted by the staff in the past.
RE: We need more active staff! - qwerasd205 - 10-28-2014
(10-28-2014, 12:32 AM)The Magical Gentleman Wrote: Personally, I'm neutral on the matter. But then again, I have not needed the services of teh adminz since becoming a member. I've seen Decap, Nuup, and Great online quite often tho.
*shrugs*
idk
Online -- But idle.
(10-28-2014, 04:39 PM)PabloDons Wrote: it's not, there's constantly a staff member when I'm on (unless it's early in the morning in which I don't bother going on)
Pablo, first of all that's in your timezone second of all they're on, but they're idle.
(10-28-2014, 03:50 AM)greatgamer34 Wrote:Also, School needs staff there's many people who leave because it's taken over 4 or so days for they're application to be noticed.(10-28-2014, 01:16 AM)GISED_Link Wrote: until greatgamer34 decline all the bad applications... we don't need more staff XD
i like the way this guy thinks
RE: We need more active staff! - newomaster - 10-29-2014
I would say that the sheer numbers of staff aren't the problem. If anything it's incompetence and/or inactivity and/or laziness.
RE: We need more active staff! - Chibill - 10-29-2014
Or over activeness.
RE: We need more active staff! - qwerasd205 - 10-29-2014
(10-29-2014, 04:35 AM)newomaster Wrote: I would say that the sheer numbers of staff aren't the problem. If anything it's incompetence and/or inactivity and/or laziness.
That's what I was trying to say!
RE: We need more active staff! - PabloDons - 10-29-2014
(10-29-2014, 02:35 PM)qwerasd205 Wrote:(10-29-2014, 04:35 AM)newomaster Wrote: I would say that the sheer numbers of staff aren't the problem. If anything it's incompetence and/or inactivity and/or laziness.
That's what I was trying to say!
in that case it would be a shame to elect even more staff. if anything we should rather expect staff to be active or resign if not. if they don't resign, even though they are as inactive as it can get, I'd personally call that greediness (no offense)
RE: We need more active staff! - TuchiTheSalt - 10-29-2014
(10-29-2014, 05:16 PM)PabloDons Wrote: in that case it would be a shame to elect even more staff. if anything we should rather expect staff to be active or resign if not. if they don't resign, even though they are as inactive as it can get, I'd personally call that greediness (no offense)i feel the same way, if staff cant be bothered being active then whats the point..?