I kinda agree with all of you. It does make sense to some degree in some cases but for the majority of comparisons it is not a reliable measure.
If you have any suggestions for modifications to the equation I would be very happy to hear.
And in response to Ice, I later realized (x+y+z)/3 gives the same number. To make size count less we could also change it up a bit and do 2-(x+y+z)^-1
Wait, no. make that 2-2/((x+y+z)/3)^2
Source: http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/orig...39/fa5.jpg
If you have any suggestions for modifications to the equation I would be very happy to hear.
And in response to Ice, I later realized (x+y+z)/3 gives the same number. To make size count less we could also change it up a bit and do 2-(x+y+z)^-1
Wait, no. make that 2-2/((x+y+z)/3)^2
Source: http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/orig...39/fa5.jpg