Teacher Rank: do we really need it?

[LambdaPI]

After many concerns about the teacher rank, it's time to really find out whether we need it or not.

Option 1: Revamp the rank.

• Keep the rank
  
• Create a manditory teaching amount (to be decided) and enforce it (teachers who don't teach will be demoted to builder)
  
• Revamp the permissions of teachers (add perks such as /kittycannon and stuff)
  
• Possibly allow teachers to claim more plots
  

Option 2: Remove it completely.

• No more teacher rank
  
• Any builder can teach with permission from the student
  
• No direct responsibilities from builder
  

[Splavacado100]

I don't really think we need any perks for teacher, I just believe we need it so that we can filter teachers, and that the builders aren't teaching incorrect information.

[LambdaPI]

The system now doesn't work, so we don't have a "keep it bcuz of nostalgia" option.

[Aerodynamic Brick]

making people teach doesn't work, wish it did but it doesn't. internet people don't like responsibility

[LambdaPI]

Making internet people teach for benefits should work.

[LambdaPI]

OPTION 3: Delete rank but have benefits for those who teach

• Removes direct responsibility
  
• Keeps the benefits for teaching idea
  
• Might be able to be combined with bounties
  

[Aerodynamic Brick]

OPTION 3: Delete rank but have benefits for those who teach

• Removes direct responsibility
  
• Keeps the benefits for teaching idea
  
• Might be able to be combined with bounties
  

this ^

[ddthj]

I'd still like the rank to exist just because a trial is required to obtain it, I don't really care about the perks as much.
I'm definitely not online enough to hold the rank if teaching becomes mandatory, but I have a nice list of students that I've taught over time

[LambdaPI]

Bump: Guys we need more votes.