+- Forums - Open Redstone Engineers (https://forum.openredstone.org)
+-- Forum: ORE General (https://forum.openredstone.org/forum-39.html)
+--- Forum: Build Discussion (https://forum.openredstone.org/forum-50.html)
+--- Thread: Server Ranks (/thread-1938.html)
Server Ranks - Kernul_Sanders - 01-11-2014
Will ranks ever be implemented into the build server, besides the ones it already has?
RE: Server Ranks - Iceglade - 01-11-2014
During the beginnings of ORE the community decided that ranks gave a sense of maybe unprecedented superiority, so they decided against adding skill-based ranks.
RE: Server Ranks - Xray_Doc - 01-11-2014
Testificate is superior rank.
RE: Server Ranks - Xeomorpher - 01-11-2014
Basically, what ice said. They created unneeded arguments, and there is no standardised measurements of genius.
RE: Server Ranks - Guy1234567890 - 01-12-2014
^ ^ ^ ^ ^
RE: Server Ranks - Xray_Doc - 01-12-2014
(01-11-2014, 10:57 PM)Xeomorpher Wrote: there is no standardised measurements of genius.
You got that right.
RE: Server Ranks - Iceglade - 01-12-2014
(01-12-2014, 12:43 AM)Xray_Doc Wrote:(01-11-2014, 10:57 PM)Xeomorpher Wrote: there is no standardised measurements of genius.
You got that right.
^ thus why IQ is irrelevant
RE: Server Ranks - Kernul_Sanders - 01-12-2014
I always thought of the ranks as to who has the most experience, thus it was easy to tell who to ask questions.
RE: Server Ranks - Iceglade - 01-12-2014
Yeah, but I still remember my last ever experience on RDF where I was being called a noob by multiple people for being builder. The system was flawed at best.
RE: Server Ranks - Xray_Doc - 01-12-2014
Unlessbyou are SethBling, you are a redstone noob.
RE: Server Ranks - AFtExploision - 01-12-2014
We need an aft rank for the most disturbed player
RE: Server Ranks - redstonewarrior - 01-12-2014
We actually experimented with a more interesting, categorical rank rank system too. We decided against them in general, they make for too much conflict. Basically, everyone preceding me has said.
RE: Server Ranks - Jmking80 - 01-12-2014
I'm against all rank systems that have a clear order of "wisedom"
I'm not against categorical system, but I think some categories will be placed above others.
And I think it will be rather hard to categorize in such a way that everyone is happy.
RE: Server Ranks - redstonewarrior - 01-12-2014
(01-12-2014, 05:19 PM)Jmking80 Wrote: I'm against all rank systems that have a clear order of "wisedom"
I'm not against categorical system, but I think some categories will be placed above others.
And I think it will be rather hard to categorize in such a way that everyone is happy.
Every system we played with had pitfalls, and the overarching issue was that "promotions" are arbitrary at best. It's very hard to determine "quality."
RE: Server Ranks - Treesin - 01-13-2014
(01-12-2014, 07:00 PM)redstonewarrior Wrote:(01-12-2014, 05:19 PM)Jmking80 Wrote: I'm against all rank systems that have a clear order of "wisedom"
I'm not against categorical system, but I think some categories will be placed above others.
And I think it will be rather hard to categorize in such a way that everyone is happy.
Every system we played with had pitfalls, and the overarching issue was that "promotions" are arbitrary at best. It's very hard to determine "quality."
I think I see what you're getting at, let's just give Treesin an awesome rank, and then close this discussion - ranks just cause too much trouble, unless they are given to Treesin.
RE: Server Ranks - Neogreenyew - 01-13-2014
I vote for a Tnt417 rank...
RE: Server Ranks - EDevil - 01-13-2014
We'll see if we can implement it...
In the meantime, locked.