'peater only ALU - Printable Version +- Forums - Open Redstone Engineers (https://forum.openredstone.org) +-- Forum: ORE General (https://forum.openredstone.org/forum-39.html) +--- Forum: Projects & Inventions (https://forum.openredstone.org/forum-19.html) +---- Forum: In Progress (https://forum.openredstone.org/forum-20.html) +---- Thread: 'peater only ALU (/thread-143.html) |
'peater only ALU - Xeomorpher - 05-04-2013 So, a while ago, I saw that CXgamer had made a repeater only half adder, which worked by utilising exact timings, and locks as well as a clock signal to produce a pulsed output, I then made a less flat (CX's was 1 high), but faster version, and then made a full adder. After playing for some time with that, I hooked up carries, and made the next adder reclock upon receipt of carry, thus making carrying adders. I then synced it all up, put it on a centeral clock, and made a fully functioning repeater only adder. After which, I began to toy with the idea of making a CPU with repeaters. The largest concern that I had, was making memory work. This would be very difficult, since it needed a constant on signal, as pulses would not work, making a constant state inverter is VERY hard with repeaters, since once you have a repeater in a 1 state, you cannot lock it to a 0. The solution to this, which I found, was to have several clocks, and utilising some very mind f*ck timing logic, I used them to create register cells, which could be written to, and preserved data (huzzah) I then created a logic layer on top of my adders, added some repeater muxes, bussed it all up ... spent hours timing it and here it is! ![]() ![]() ![]() Core of an adder ![]() Register cell ![]() Controls RE: 'peater only ALU - newomaster - 05-04-2013 Very fancy and very laggy ![]() I don't know what the use of this is, but who needs one? RE: 'peater only ALU - Xeomorpher - 05-05-2013 It looks cool at night. RE: 'peater only ALU - EDevil - 05-05-2013 (05-05-2013, 09:11 AM)Xeomorpher Wrote: It looks cool at night. Can't argue with that! Awesome work Xeo! RE: 'peater only ALU - CMOSprinkles - 05-29-2013 How sir... How did your head not explode... RE: 'peater only ALU - Xeomorpher - 06-03-2013 <.< Not as I recall. RE: 'peater only ALU - Chibill - 06-03-2013 Cool!!!! RE: 'peater only ALU - Billman555555 - 07-23-2013 It did have torches but I changed them with piston inverters ![]() And kept it torchless but not piston less. |