+- Forums - Open Redstone Engineers (https://forum.openredstone.org)
+-- Forum: Announcements (https://forum.openredstone.org/forum-102.html)
+--- Forum: Announcements (https://forum.openredstone.org/forum-7.html)
+--- Thread: About survival. (/thread-11343.html)
RE: About survival. - PabloDons - 12-03-2016
Except we haven't agreed upon what to do with the server after an update yet
RE: About survival. - Aerodynamic Brick - 12-03-2016
chest lockers are annoying... really a turn off. Anyways a reset is much needed. maybe a ftb instead. not doing both at once might limit the number of people on them both
RE: About survival. - TheMiner63 - 12-03-2016
I think that the map should clearly be reset. Although resetting the map is a good opportunity to change things up, I don't think we should do full on factions OR locking chests/economy plugins. I think the punishments could be relaxed to stop people expecting every diamond they deposit to be monitored 24/7, but it should still be trust based. I think it works well as it is because people are able to do PvP if they want, while people can share chests easily also. Maybe you could add a plugin for PvP management but do not remove it entirely. I vote for map reset but not for major modification of the survival scenario.
- TheMiner63
https://github.com/TheMiner63
https://github.com/WSNCoding
http://wsncoding.github.io/
RE: About survival. - LambdaPI - 12-04-2016
Wow 0 no's
RE: About survival. - Apuly - 12-04-2016
w0t u talkin abut deres 1
RE: About survival. - tokumei - 12-06-2016
In my opinion, punishments should be laxed. If there is another way to resolve the issue, a ban isn't needed. At least find some way to allow minor/non-destructive practical jokes. Bans can still be used for times when someone has repeatedly/intentionally bothered someone, but the punishment, if any, should be handled on a case-by-case basis.
RE: About survival. - Guy1234567890 - 12-06-2016
+1 .
RE: About survival. - Chibill - 12-06-2016
+1 @none