The idea was a simple ratio to describe efficiency of a circuit, and size is not part of that. Also, quite possibly we should use the average speed of the device as opposed to the max, as there might be that one operation/possibility that takes 15 ticks. Who knows? just a thought.
Poll: I would totally use this measure 'cause it sounds awesome and superuseful! You do not have permission to vote in this poll. |
|||
Yes! | 0 | 0% | |
Yes! | 0 | 0% | |
YESSSSSSSS!!! | 2 | 14.29% | |
Hell yeah! | 2 | 14.29% | |
Woo! | 0 | 0% | |
I approve of this. | 5 | 35.71% | |
Fuck yes! | 2 | 14.29% | |
... No comment. | 3 | 21.43% | |
Total | 14 vote(s) | 100% |
* You voted for this item. | [Show Results] |
12-24-2013, 07:00 PM
(This post was last modified: 12-24-2013, 07:02 PM by qwerasd205.)
So a herp is fastest possible basic speed / the time it actually takes for your gate to do it?
This is my signature.
04-19-2014, 03:21 PM
Haha, I totally forgot about this thread and would like to revive the topic. After some time, looking back I realize what an impractical measure this is but I do think it's an interesting topic to discuss.
It's kinda hard to see what you wrote in that paper, wryt. And frankly I'm not the best at reading other people's formulas. It would be nice if you could elaborate further. Variables to consider: - Circuit delay - Throughput - Size - Logic operations Ice has a valid point about size and this makes me want to introduce two, instead of one, new measures: herps and spaceherps. Names are not final and are definitely up for discussion.
04-19-2014, 04:14 PM
04-19-2014, 08:05 PM
04-19-2014, 09:22 PM
(04-19-2014, 08:05 PM)RandOMFG Wrote:(04-19-2014, 04:14 PM)AFtExploision Wrote:(12-25-2013, 10:30 PM)WrytXander Wrote: What about this, lol No.
04-19-2014, 11:36 PM
(04-19-2014, 08:05 PM)RandOMFG Wrote:If you want, I could post some of my scribblings(04-19-2014, 04:14 PM)AFtExploision Wrote:(12-25-2013, 10:30 PM)WrytXander Wrote: What about this, lol
04-20-2014, 10:20 AM
POST IT IN TEXT GODDAMN
|
|