+- Forums - Open Redstone Engineers (https://forum.openredstone.org)
+-- Forum: ORE General (https://forum.openredstone.org/forum-39.html)
+--- Forum: Build Discussion (https://forum.openredstone.org/forum-50.html)
+--- Thread: New Plot o' logic layout feedbackerino (/thread-6174.html)
RE: New Plot o' logic layout feedbackerino - Nuuppanaani - 04-16-2015
This splits a lot of opinions. Guess I'll have to edit in a poll with the options and see what people find the most convenient. If you have more ideas please post them now.
And of course stuff would still be divided into gates, adders etc. under the main groups.
RE: New Plot o' logic layout feedbackerino - GISED_Link - 04-16-2015
(04-14-2015, 09:28 PM)Nuuppanaani Wrote: The new POL is not yet set up but it will be in a day or two. However, we're unaware on the layout we're going for.
I propose this:
4 different sections
Then those are divided into smaller sub-categories, like different gates, adders, memory etc.
- Stuff with pistons
- Pistonless horizontal
- Pistonless diagonal
- Pistonless vertical
Nick proposed we should do the same, but with 2 sections:
~ more ~
- Piston stuff
- Pistonless stuff
I think you are making it wrong. You are dividing the plot according to the Physical technology. And as it was said before, there is more than 2 physical technologies (Hex for example (!) ). See there for more details : http://forum.openredstone.org/showthread.php?tid=6056
According to my post about wiki organization (see http://forum.openredstone.org/showthread.php?tid=6078&pid=37342#pid37342), I think we should divide the four plots by categories. I mean one plot for the components (even there are a lot of kind, they are small, so..), two for the devices, and I let the fourth for other things (water logic, piston only and some other "exotic" things ?)
I think we can seperate the diffrent physical technlogies into the plot by letting a bit of space between the components/devices.
So, my idea is :
- Components (with all the using/useful physical technologies)
- Devices 1
- Devices 2
- Exotic diveces (all the un-using/ unuseful physical technogies) (because it's alway fun ^^)
RE: New Plot o' logic layout feedbackerino - PablitaDons - 04-16-2015
(04-16-2015, 09:51 PM)GISED_Link Wrote:(04-14-2015, 09:28 PM)Nuuppanaani Wrote: ~stuff~
I think you are making it wrong. You are dividing the plot according to the Physical technology. And as it was said before, there is more than 2 physical technologies (Hex for example (!) ). See there for more details : http://forum.openredstone.org/showthread.php?tid=6056
According to my post about wiki organization (see http://forum.openredstone.org/showthread.php?tid=6078&pid=37342#pid37342), I think we should divide the four plots by categories. I mean one plot for the components (even there are a lot of kind, they are small, so..), two for the devices, and I let the fourth for other things (water logic, piston only and some other "exotic" things ?)
I think we can seperate the diffrent physical technlogies into the plot by letting a bit of space between the components/devices.
So, my idea is :
So, what do you think about that ?
- Components (with all the using/useful physical technologies)
- Devices 1
- Devices 2
- Exotic diveces (all the un-using/ unuseful physical technolies) (because it's alway fun ^^)
gr8 b8 m8 r8 8/8
RE: New Plot o' logic layout feedbackerino - Nuuppanaani - 04-16-2015
(04-16-2015, 09:51 PM)GISED_Link Wrote:(04-14-2015, 09:28 PM)Nuuppanaani Wrote: The new POL is not yet set up but it will be in a day or two. However, we're unaware on the layout we're going for.
I propose this:
4 different sections
Then those are divided into smaller sub-categories, like different gates, adders, memory etc.
- Stuff with pistons
- Pistonless horizontal
- Pistonless diagonal
- Pistonless vertical
Nick proposed we should do the same, but with 2 sections:
~ more ~
- Piston stuff
- Pistonless stuff
I think you are making it wrong. You are dividing the plot according to the Physical technology. And as it was said before, there is more than 2 physical technologies (Hex for example (!) ). See there for more details : http://forum.openredstone.org/showthread.php?tid=6056
According to my post about wiki organization (see http://forum.openredstone.org/showthread.php?tid=6078&pid=37342#pid37342), I think we should divide the four plots by categories. I mean one plot for the components (even there are a lot of kind, they are small, so..), two for the devices, and I let the fourth for other things (water logic, piston only and some other "exotic" things ?)
I think we can seperate the diffrent physical technlogies into the plot by letting a bit of space between the components/devices.
So, my idea is :
So, what do you think about that ?
- Components (with all the using/useful physical technologies)
- Devices 1
- Devices 2
- Exotic diveces (all the un-using/ unuseful physical technogies) (because it's alway fun ^^)
Can I have examples of what exactly is a component and what is a device?
RE: New Plot o' logic layout feedbackerino - Legofreak - 04-16-2015
I wouldn't mind a hex section...
that's the only place where I would put stuff... lol
RE: New Plot o' logic layout feedbackerino - LordDecapo - 04-17-2015
we can do this, but i say change 1 thing. split every category into 3 different border colors (so like the lines in ground that border the device). and border Horiz. Vert. and Diag. in those 3 different colors.
RE: New Plot o' logic layout feedbackerino - Crazyninja2000 - 04-17-2015
we should not group things of what they are made of or what their architecture is but what there function is. i think we should have a gates section, an adder section, a memory section, and a miscellaneous section.
the gates section would have sub sections like OR, NOR, AND, NAND, XOR, XNOR, and NOT.
the adders section would have sub sections like RCA, ICA, CLA, CLE, and what ever other types of adders people have made.
the memory section would have sub sections like flip flops and latches.
the miscellaneous would have any sub sections that dont fit into any category(like program counters and clocks).
we should leave extra room for sections in case if there is a new sub section.
RE: New Plot o' logic layout feedbackerino - Nickster258 - 04-17-2015
Maybe we can setup a warp system of sorts? /waro pol_alu_nickster258_pistonless ? Add tags for specific things. Doesn't even need to be a warp system. It can be a basic block / bright block that denotes "piston" vs "pistonless". As crazy said, I too do not like the "segregation" of one type of part to the other.
RE: New Plot o' logic layout feedbackerino - LordDecapo - 04-17-2015
Do you still have that bot running nick? If so, can we give it a @POL command? Then it will PM you a list of categories and you can the do something like @Hex, then @Adders and the final one will list all devises and give you a "warp key" to go to that device...
Hell tell me where the config file is and I can program that.
RE: New Plot o' logic layout feedbackerino - Crazyninja2000 - 04-17-2015
why do you need to warp to something when you can just fly around checking them out. i would not like to do ./warp pol_ICA_ALU_<name> each time to check out all of the ICA ALUs. the warp is only good when you know the specific component you want.