TeX is back nubs - Printable Version +- Forums - Open Redstone Engineers (https://forum.openredstone.org) +-- Forum: Off-Topic (https://forum.openredstone.org/forum-4.html) +--- Forum: Off-Topic Discussion (https://forum.openredstone.org/forum-5.html) +---- Forum: Shenanigans (https://forum.openredstone.org/forum-31.html) +---- Thread: TeX is back nubs (/thread-2612.html) |
TeX is back nubs - Iceglade - 02-28-2014 EAT IT RE: TeX is back nubs - Dcentrics - 02-28-2014 *unzips pants* IT AIN'T GOIN SUCK IT SELF ICE BENDOVA RE: TeX is back nubs - Iceglade - 02-28-2014 tfw thread didn't last one post RE: TeX is back nubs - Dcentrics - 02-28-2014 TF were you expecting breh, This IS SHINIANDFJA;DKFA[DNKFA'SDLFJ RE: TeX is back nubs - Xray_Doc - 02-28-2014 Tell me what tfw stands for (both meanings) RE: TeX is back nubs - Iceglade - 02-28-2014 that feel when the fk what RE: TeX is back nubs - Xray_Doc - 02-28-2014 1st one is right, the 2nd is wrong. The other one is more common when used. RE: TeX is back nubs - Iceglade - 03-01-2014 kk i have no idea Never mind, there was never anything here RE: TeX is back nubs - Xray_Doc - 03-01-2014 The fact when RE: TeX is back nubs - Iceglade - 03-01-2014 kkthx RE: TeX is back nubs - Xray_Doc - 03-01-2014 newfigs RE: TeX is back nubs - AFtExploision - 03-01-2014 some of those are wrong, you never defined a, b, or c to be whole numbers / which side of a triangle they are! RE: TeX is back nubs - Iceglade - 03-01-2014 That makes them wrong? |