+- Forums - Open Redstone Engineers (https://forum.openredstone.org)
+-- Forum: ORE General (https://forum.openredstone.org/forum-39.html)
+--- Forum: Projects & Inventions (https://forum.openredstone.org/forum-19.html)
+---- Forum: Completed Projects (https://forum.openredstone.org/forum-21.html)
+---- Thread: Most compact binary adder (/thread-10253.html)
Pages:
1
2
RE: Most compact binary adder - newomaster - 07-09-2016
Two tall tileable adders this small are a beast. I don't normally redstone anymore, but this looks like a fun challenge. Embi, I shall give this a shot. I presume we don't care about speed?
RE: Most compact binary adder - embizone - 07-09-2016
(07-09-2016, 06:01 AM)Nickster258 Wrote: I always under the impression that dimensions are usable dimensions (therefore the 9 long) with stacking considered (therefore the 4 tall).
That has never been the case... is my 4 wide CCA not 4 wide because you can't tile it? Of course not.
(07-09-2016, 07:47 AM)newomaster Wrote: Two tall tileable adders this small are a beast. I don't normally redstone anymore, but this looks like a fun challenge. Embi, I shall give this a shot. I presume we don't care about speed?
I mentioned twice that this is trivial. Here's a design that is 2 high x 4 wide x 9 long: http://imgur.com/a/xwg9J
RE: Most compact binary adder - GISED_Link - 07-10-2016
For me, the last design is the best. I will look if we can stack it diffrently to have the first input up and the second below (each bit of the same byte at the same high).
About the dimension, it depends of the purpose. If the device is not design to be staked (e.w. an ALU), we don't have to give to stacking dimension.
RE: Most compact binary adder - auztin3 - 07-23-2016
Oh boy, what have I missed. >_>