+- Forums - Open Redstone Engineers (https://forum.openredstone.org)
+-- Forum: ORE General (https://forum.openredstone.org/forum-39.html)
+--- Forum: Projects & Inventions (https://forum.openredstone.org/forum-19.html)
+---- Forum: Completed Projects (https://forum.openredstone.org/forum-21.html)
+---- Thread: Most compact binary adder (/thread-10253.html)
Pages:
1
2
Most compact binary adder - embizone - 07-07-2016
Think I made the most compact binary adder in Minecraft.
Dimensions: 8 long x 4 wide x 2 high = 64 blocks per bit
Pictures:
[attachment=743]
[attachment=742]
[attachment=741]
Update: 2 high tileable version that is 9 long x 4 wide x 2 high: http://imgur.com/a/xwg9J
RE: Most compact binary adder - embizone - 07-07-2016
How the fuck do pictures work...
RE: Most compact binary adder - slugdude - 07-07-2016
May I add that for a few tiny hours I held the record after I beat Embi's initial 80blocks/bit with a vertical 72block/bit. He quickly retorted D:
RE: Most compact binary adder - Apocryphan - 07-08-2016
Your supposed to riposte when they retort! ouchies!
RE: Most compact binary adder - Apocryphan - 07-08-2016
(07-07-2016, 07:40 PM)embizone Wrote: How the fuck do pictures work...
looks like one of those old polaroid pictures, next to the paper thing that bills arrive in. just put in the link address after a single click, beware the double clicks, they do almost nothing. cheers!
RE: Most compact binary adder - GISED_Link - 07-08-2016
Unfortunaltely, you cannot stack it verticaly... even if you let 1 block of space between the modules (risk of BUD...).
But I think we have something really interesting here.
RE: Most compact binary adder - embizone - 07-08-2016
(07-08-2016, 01:11 PM)GISED_Link Wrote: Unfortunaltely, you cannot stack it verticaly... even if you let 1 block of space between the modules (risk of BUD...).
But I think we have something really interesting here.
It can be stacked vertically by making it two blocks longer.
RE: Most compact binary adder - Nickster258 - 07-09-2016
This design is 9 long also. Right input requires direct power, therefore a simple redstone signal can't power the redstone dust behind the block with the lever on it, a repeater is required.
Also, with the BUDs, usable height of the system is 4 blocks.
RE: Most compact binary adder - embizone - 07-09-2016
(07-09-2016, 02:21 AM)Nickster258 Wrote: This design is 9 long also. Right input requires direct power, therefore a simple redstone signal can't power the redstone dust behind the block with the lever on it, a repeater is required.
No it isn't... that's not how we evaluate dimensions. Either way you can just add a repeater and solve the problem...
Quote:Also, with the BUDs, usable height of the system is 4 blocks.
It wasn't made to be stacked vertically. If you want to, just make it two blocks longer and you can stack it 2 high.
RE: Most compact binary adder - Nickster258 - 07-09-2016
I always under the impression that dimensions are usable dimensions (therefore the 9 long) with stacking considered (therefore the 4 tall).