+- Forums - Open Redstone Engineers (https://forum.openredstone.org)
+-- Forum: ORE General (https://forum.openredstone.org/forum-39.html)
+--- Forum: Projects & Inventions (https://forum.openredstone.org/forum-19.html)
+---- Forum: Completed Projects (https://forum.openredstone.org/forum-21.html)
+---- Thread: Most compact binary adder (/thread-10253.html)
Most compact binary adder - embizone - 07-07-2016
Think I made the most compact binary adder in Minecraft.
Dimensions: 8 long x 4 wide x 2 high = 64 blocks per bit
Pictures:
[attachment=743]
[attachment=742]
[attachment=741]
Update: 2 high tileable version that is 9 long x 4 wide x 2 high: http://imgur.com/a/xwg9J
RE: Most compact binary adder - embizone - 07-07-2016
How the fuck do pictures work...
RE: Most compact binary adder - slugdude - 07-07-2016
May I add that for a few tiny hours I held the record after I beat Embi's initial 80blocks/bit with a vertical 72block/bit. He quickly retorted D:
RE: Most compact binary adder - Apocryphan - 07-08-2016
Your supposed to riposte when they retort! ouchies!
RE: Most compact binary adder - Apocryphan - 07-08-2016
(07-07-2016, 07:40 PM)embizone Wrote: How the fuck do pictures work...
looks like one of those old polaroid pictures, next to the paper thing that bills arrive in. just put in the link address after a single click, beware the double clicks, they do almost nothing. cheers!
RE: Most compact binary adder - GISED_Link - 07-08-2016
Unfortunaltely, you cannot stack it verticaly... even if you let 1 block of space between the modules (risk of BUD...).
But I think we have something really interesting here.
RE: Most compact binary adder - embizone - 07-08-2016
(07-08-2016, 01:11 PM)GISED_Link Wrote: Unfortunaltely, you cannot stack it verticaly... even if you let 1 block of space between the modules (risk of BUD...).
But I think we have something really interesting here.
It can be stacked vertically by making it two blocks longer.
RE: Most compact binary adder - Nickster258 - 07-09-2016
This design is 9 long also. Right input requires direct power, therefore a simple redstone signal can't power the redstone dust behind the block with the lever on it, a repeater is required.
Also, with the BUDs, usable height of the system is 4 blocks.
RE: Most compact binary adder - embizone - 07-09-2016
(07-09-2016, 02:21 AM)Nickster258 Wrote: This design is 9 long also. Right input requires direct power, therefore a simple redstone signal can't power the redstone dust behind the block with the lever on it, a repeater is required.
No it isn't... that's not how we evaluate dimensions. Either way you can just add a repeater and solve the problem...
Quote:Also, with the BUDs, usable height of the system is 4 blocks.
It wasn't made to be stacked vertically. If you want to, just make it two blocks longer and you can stack it 2 high.
RE: Most compact binary adder - Nickster258 - 07-09-2016
I always under the impression that dimensions are usable dimensions (therefore the 9 long) with stacking considered (therefore the 4 tall).
RE: Most compact binary adder - newomaster - 07-09-2016
Two tall tileable adders this small are a beast. I don't normally redstone anymore, but this looks like a fun challenge. Embi, I shall give this a shot. I presume we don't care about speed?
RE: Most compact binary adder - embizone - 07-09-2016
(07-09-2016, 06:01 AM)Nickster258 Wrote: I always under the impression that dimensions are usable dimensions (therefore the 9 long) with stacking considered (therefore the 4 tall).
That has never been the case... is my 4 wide CCA not 4 wide because you can't tile it? Of course not.
(07-09-2016, 07:47 AM)newomaster Wrote: Two tall tileable adders this small are a beast. I don't normally redstone anymore, but this looks like a fun challenge. Embi, I shall give this a shot. I presume we don't care about speed?
I mentioned twice that this is trivial. Here's a design that is 2 high x 4 wide x 9 long: http://imgur.com/a/xwg9J
RE: Most compact binary adder - GISED_Link - 07-10-2016
For me, the last design is the best. I will look if we can stack it diffrently to have the first input up and the second below (each bit of the same byte at the same high).
About the dimension, it depends of the purpose. If the device is not design to be staked (e.w. an ALU), we don't have to give to stacking dimension.
RE: Most compact binary adder - auztin3 - 07-23-2016
Oh boy, what have I missed. >_>